<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old People Shouldn&#8217;t Be Driving!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zanderchance.com/2009/01/30/old-people-shouldnt-be-driving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zanderchance.com/2009/01/30/old-people-shouldnt-be-driving/</link>
	<description>The Best Super Affiliate You've Never Heard Of!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Poppernuts</title>
		<link>http://www.zanderchance.com/2009/01/30/old-people-shouldnt-be-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Poppernuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanderchance.com/?p=669#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>At what age does a person become infirm enough to not be driving.  I&#039;ve
seen people that got licenses at agt 16 when I was a kid that because of
hidden medical conditions, drove till they either killed someone else or
themselves or both.

Every DMV in the nation would like an answer to this problem.  I have
worked in public safety for 40 years and am near retirement.  The agency
I work for requires commissioned officers to retire at age 60 unless
after a rigerous physical examination they are found fit to continue and
then only for 2 or 3 years beyond 60.

Driving should be the same.  Start with a physical exam at any age, put 
the onus on the medical community to send in a report on anyone of 
driving age that is suspect of being incapable of driving, that way only
doctors would have drivers licenses.  You get the idea though. It has
to be a hard and fast rule or regulation that is adopted or mandated
nationwide like the 55mph speed limit was a few years back.  Driving is
a privilege, not a right as the Supreme Court has already ruled on.

Killing or maiming someone with a motor vehicle is not and should not be
allowed or approved of for any reason.

If you look at the statistics they will tell you one thing, There is a
certain age at which drivers of a certain age have fewer crashes, they 
start with a high for youger drivers, that&#039;s why young people above the
age of 25 start getting better rates on car insurance and usually will
continue till and when a person starts having multiple crashes at an 
older age.

Many DMV&#039;s already have a program in place that recognizes the numbber 
of crashes and or violatons and when they reach a certain number the
driver is required to take a test to continue driving.  But and it is a
big BUT, no pun intended, just because someone is SUSPENDED, CANCELLED,
or REVOKED does not mean they can be made to stop driving,  I see it all
the time.  Many times as the driver in a fatality crash report.  There
are no easy answers to this problem.  

Everyone has a responsibility to report poor driving on the part of any
driver as it may result in a person being curtailed from driving.

I saw this as a kid.  An 87 year old man got confused, hit the gas 
instead of the brake, ran over a parking meter, when through the front 
of a ladies wear store and kill 2 women and a child.  He was charged
with Vehicular Homicide, but come on really what do you do with an 
otherwise responsibile elderly citizen who won&#039;t live long anyway other
than to take their license and that&#039;s about all.

I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what age does a person become infirm enough to not be driving.  I&#8217;ve<br />
seen people that got licenses at agt 16 when I was a kid that because of<br />
hidden medical conditions, drove till they either killed someone else or<br />
themselves or both.</p>
<p>Every DMV in the nation would like an answer to this problem.  I have<br />
worked in public safety for 40 years and am near retirement.  The agency<br />
I work for requires commissioned officers to retire at age 60 unless<br />
after a rigerous physical examination they are found fit to continue and<br />
then only for 2 or 3 years beyond 60.</p>
<p>Driving should be the same.  Start with a physical exam at any age, put<br />
the onus on the medical community to send in a report on anyone of<br />
driving age that is suspect of being incapable of driving, that way only<br />
doctors would have drivers licenses.  You get the idea though. It has<br />
to be a hard and fast rule or regulation that is adopted or mandated<br />
nationwide like the 55mph speed limit was a few years back.  Driving is<br />
a privilege, not a right as the Supreme Court has already ruled on.</p>
<p>Killing or maiming someone with a motor vehicle is not and should not be<br />
allowed or approved of for any reason.</p>
<p>If you look at the statistics they will tell you one thing, There is a<br />
certain age at which drivers of a certain age have fewer crashes, they<br />
start with a high for youger drivers, that&#8217;s why young people above the<br />
age of 25 start getting better rates on car insurance and usually will<br />
continue till and when a person starts having multiple crashes at an<br />
older age.</p>
<p>Many DMV&#8217;s already have a program in place that recognizes the numbber<br />
of crashes and or violatons and when they reach a certain number the<br />
driver is required to take a test to continue driving.  But and it is a<br />
big BUT, no pun intended, just because someone is SUSPENDED, CANCELLED,<br />
or REVOKED does not mean they can be made to stop driving,  I see it all<br />
the time.  Many times as the driver in a fatality crash report.  There<br />
are no easy answers to this problem.  </p>
<p>Everyone has a responsibility to report poor driving on the part of any<br />
driver as it may result in a person being curtailed from driving.</p>
<p>I saw this as a kid.  An 87 year old man got confused, hit the gas<br />
instead of the brake, ran over a parking meter, when through the front<br />
of a ladies wear store and kill 2 women and a child.  He was charged<br />
with Vehicular Homicide, but come on really what do you do with an<br />
otherwise responsibile elderly citizen who won&#8217;t live long anyway other<br />
than to take their license and that&#8217;s about all.</p>
<p>I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bournemouth Driving Lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.zanderchance.com/2009/01/30/old-people-shouldnt-be-driving/comment-page-1/#comment-2479</link>
		<dc:creator>Bournemouth Driving Lessons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zanderchance.com/?p=669#comment-2479</guid>
		<description>I think that people should be re-tested every 10 years. If you fail it wouldn&#039;t necessarily mean you couldn&#039;t drive again straight away, but you might have 6 months to take refresher lessons and re-take your test or something. It will probably happen one day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that people should be re-tested every 10 years. If you fail it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily mean you couldn&#8217;t drive again straight away, but you might have 6 months to take refresher lessons and re-take your test or something. It will probably happen one day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

